a good strategy?

[luci89]

receive email updates from a self proclaimed "poker expert" Roy Rounder. In one of these he talks of a playing style "tight agressive squared". Basically, in a low stakes sit n go you shold hold back for a premium hand aa kk ect, then go all in, and play like this till you get down to 3 players. I've tried it and had no result. Just wondering if anyone heard of this and found it to be a good strategy? Any advice on low stakes sit n go's greatly appreciated also.

[ChosenOne]

I've heard something about that
Basically you should play tight and wait until there are 3 players left and you're sure to get in the money before starting playing loose, since in many SnGs there are fishes that just play too aggressive and sooner or later they'll be knocked out.
Of course you can't just wait for AA or KK and go all in, because nobody is gonna call you; you've got to play some strong hands to avoid being killed by blind levels and maybe try to steal a couple of blinds. This way you won't probably make a high stack but if you make it to the last 3, then you'll have chips enough to risk something more (the difference between 3rd and 2nd prize is not much,while it is much between 2nd and 1st so it doesn't make sense to keep playing tight).
I think this style of playing though is based a little bit more on luck, since you play less hands but you've got to win them, that's why it is hard to employ it successfully.

[alavi]

You get aa once in 220 hands, and most of sit n go dont last that long so that strategy is bullshit, wait for such premium hand will only blind you out.

[germanfalcon]

Mostly all said. Some tips of Roy Rounder are worth reading. This guy must have one of the biggest email list of poker players because he is clever marketing all his tools and ebooks.