Pocket Aces versus flush draw flop
I read a post about an hand history involving the Hero holding AA heads up with two cards to the flush on the flop. The villain had limped from under the gun and called the Hero's pot sized raise pre-flop. In the actual hand the Hero bets the pot again which was about half his remaining chips. Of course the Villain, who has a much larger stack, calls the pot bet on the flop. A blank comes on the turn and the Hero bets the rest of his chips (about 1/3) of the pot and the Villain calls again showing the nut flush draw which hits on the river to eliminate the Hero.
Most of the responses in this closed thread recommended that the Hero should have pushed all-in on the flop or pre-flop etc. In my opinion the Hero would have been better off betting 1/2 the pot on the flop. If the Villain has nothing, he will fold to a 1/2 pot bet as easily as a full pot bet and it still is a negative EV play for the flush draw to call 1/2 pot bet (3 to 1) to see the turn. Also, this is more advantageous to the Hero if the flush card comes on the turn. The Hero will save 1/2 the pot. Additionally, I have found more success in getting people to lay down their flush draws to a big bet on the turn than a big bet on the flop. In the example hand the hero only had about 1/3 of the pot left to bet on the turn which wasn't enough to chase the villain off his draw. However, had the Hero bet only 1/2 the pot on the flop, the Hero could have made a larger bet on the turn 2/3 to a full pot bet which may have had more success pushing him off his hand.
|