Always an interesting subject for debate and I recently heard Daniel Negreanu talking about it. His opinion was that at a low stakes game he would show a bluff so as to generate some action whereas he wouldn`t show cards if he had the nuts.
Yes you might lose the opportunity to steal a couple of pots by showing but the intent is to get someone to call when you have a very solid hand so you get paid off bigtime. Then when that happens your opponents are off balance the next time you make a big play. They might want to call because they have an idea you`re bluffing but at the same time they don`t want to pay you off if you have a monster hand.
Last edited by dangermouse420 : 09-03-2007 at 11:25 PM.
|