I'm sorry I have to ask this about WassPoker...

[buggerlugs47]

It seems to me that the main complaint is winning on the river on merge but this happens at every site and even in live games the other night on the telly I watch and note 12 hands of poker of which 5 were won on the river so does the dealer cheat there as well..........I know how annoying it is and why some may want to look into the rng but the people who run these are never going to willingly tell anyone about exactly how it works .........or thats their millions gone to someone else......

[timniles44]

you after this i figured that some of us have way to much free time on our hands .lol as far as rng goes some sites I've noticed its far better to play the site and your cards rather than the players although you really have to play all three to win constantly. Also Ive found in my MANY hours of online play , that some days nomatter what you play you lose.lol Another thing Ive noticed and maybe you can tell me what up with this. But for the last 8months that on the the 8,9 and 10 of each of these last months I dont lose it doesnt matter what cards I play. I wouldnt blame the RNg but look into some other part of the computer underworld> lol

[natsdad]

I think it's really funny that after all the time some of you guys have spent denigrating poker.com as 'river.com' that WassPoker finds it's home on Merge. Sweet.

RNGs are random. What purpose would it serve for it not to be? As Doc mentioned it's a multi-billion dollar industry and trust is a big issue when it comes to online gaming so surely they're gonna make sure the RNG is reliably random. I think anyone who asks themselves these old RNG questions is obviously on a downswing. The best remedy is to take a break.

Don't know the ins and outs of the Full Tilt problem but the Absolute one had absolutely nothing to do with the RNG.